Skip to main content

_bold-pc

Pros​

  • Improved Security: Mitigates delay attacks and ensures only valid states are confirmed, with high bonds (e.g., millions in USD equivalent) deterring malice while allowing trustless defense.
  • Permissionless Decentralization: Anyone can validate via bonds, reducing reliance on centralized entities and enabling community participation through pools.
  • Bounded Delays: Caps withdrawal delays at ~12.8 days during disputes, providing predictability.
  • Incentives: Includes bounties (1% of confiscated bonds) and reimbursements for honest defenders, plus optional chain-specific rewards.

Cons​

  • High Economic Barriers: Large bonds (e.g., 3600 ETH for assertions on Arbitrum One) may limit small-scale participation without pools, and disputes impose opportunity costs on users (e.g., ~$3.27M USD/week for Arbitrum One's TVL).
  • Upgrade Disruptions: Enabling BoLD delays pending withdrawals and requires careful overflow handling during the upgrade.
  • Complexity: Adds operational needs for proposers and parameter tuning (e.g., bond sizes, resource ratios) to maintain security.